Pre-Discovery scope proposal

Global Money

One account. Every currency. UK & Nigeria.
Indicative pre-Discovery scope model — not a fixed quote or legal advice
Markets
UK+NG
Nigeria first, UK as a funded Phase 2
Rails
Fiat+Crypto
5 fiat · 3 assets behind one wallet
Model
Partner-led
consolidated provider under its umbrella
Apps
iOS+Android
cross-platform, native where it counts
Goal 01
Launch
Ship a premium wallet fast, on partner rails
Goal 02
De-risk
Partner umbrella cuts capital and regulation
Goal 03
Own UX
Hold and move fiat + crypto behind one brand
Goal 04
Scale
Add markets and in-house licences on evidence
Our approach — a partner, not a vendor

We don't sell hours and bodies.

Build with you

One backlog from day one — your product vision plus our fintech and blockchain engineers.

Sequence, don't cut

Every deferred feature maps to your own Phase-2 list — we stage the vision, we don't shrink it.

Honest numbers

Every hour and cost is on screen and firms up at Discovery. No surprises mid-build.

02 · Vision

What we are building — and why now

Global Money is a single premium account that lets people in emerging markets hold, move and grow money across currencies and crypto — one balance, one brand, bank-grade security. Instead of juggling a Naira bank app, a dollar account and a separate crypto exchange, a user can receive, buy, sell, convert and withdraw fiat and digital assets from one place, with KYC/BVN onboarding built in.

The opportunity

One wallet for currency-volatile, fast-growing markets

The problem

In markets like Nigeria, people hold Naira, dollars and stable-value crypto across disconnected apps. Access to USD / USDT is a hedge against currency swings, but moving between them is slow, costly and fragmented.

The product

A cross-platform mobile wallet — receive, hold, buy, sell, convert and withdraw fiat and crypto behind one account, with biometric security, live pricing and compliant onboarding.

Why now

Crypto is now legal-but-regulated in both target markets: Nigeria's ISA 2025 brought digital assets under the SEC and the CBN reopened banking access; the UK runs an MLR + promotions regime with full FSMA rules landing by 2027. The compliant path exists — premium, trusted UX wins first.

Where this goes

Markets & model — sequenced, not scattered

Nigeria first

The strongest NGN ⇄ USDT/USD loop and available licensed local partners. Launch on a licensed MMO / bank with BVN KYC — the app layer only.

UK as a funded Phase 2

Enter as an EMD / PSD agent of an FCA-authorised EMI (e.g. OpenPayd) — no own licence and no €350k capital lock-up at launch.

Then EU, UAE, US

Each is a separate, evidence-led expansion. There is no mutual recognition, so every market is licensed locally once volume justifies it.

Partner-led by design

Regulated partners sit behind one adapter; you keep the brand, UX and product logic while deferring licences, capital and regulatory burden.

Live money-movement flow

See a payment move end-to-end

How a payment moves end-to-end — user request, KYC gate, banking / custody, liquidity, ledger, settlement. Watch it live; flip to Stress and rejected transactions rise.

Transaction feed
buy withdraw transfer red = rejected at the KYC / AML gate
03 · Architecture

Target architecture

Every regulated partner sits behind one adapter — swap or add a provider without touching the apps. Switch views; click a module for design intent, the engineering gotcha, and the requirements it covers.

Global Money platform— fiat + crypto wallet
Client appscross-platform · native modules
Onboardingauth · KYC · BVN
Money movementreceive · buy · sell · convert · withdraw
Backend & adapterproduct logic · provider seam
Ledgerdouble-entry · reconciliation
Security & fraud gatebiometrics · RBAC · webhooks
Regulated partnersswappable behind the adapter
Banking · Custody · LiquidityOpenPayd · Fireblocks · ramp/B2C2
KYC · AMLSumsub + BVN · screening
Click any module → detail drawer slides in from the right.
04 · Alternatives

Architectures we genuinely evaluated

Three honest, buildable configurations — including the leanest safe baseline. We recommend the Optimized MVP, and show why, not just that.

Baseline

Lean pilot · Android-first

Build cost~$140k · lowest
Time to users~3–4 mo · fastest
CoverageMust-have only

One platform, one consolidated provider, must-have core. Proves demand cheapest — but no send/convert/statements and Android only.

Recommended

Optimized MVP

Build cost~$200k · mid
Time to users~4–6 mo · fast
CoverageMust + recommended

Cross-platform, one consolidated provider under its umbrella, Nigeria-first with UK as a funded Phase 2. Premium UX, affordable, shippable.

Evaluated

Full original scope

Build cost~$358k · highest
Time to users~9–12 mo · slowest
CoverageEverything, both markets

Two native codebases, five discrete partners, live failover, custom admin, AI. Maximum control and margin — at roughly double the MVP and a longer timeline.

Indicative time-to-users, aligned with Delivery (section 06) and the ~16-week Nigeria integration window (section 07): the Optimized MVP reaches a Nigeria launch in ~4–6 months (Discovery + Phase 1), with UK as a funded Phase 2 (a further ~4–6 months); the full scope builds both markets up front. Costs are the same indicative build budgets as section 09, blended $52/h — everything firms up at Discovery.

Full scope vs recommended MVP

What moves to Phase 2 — and why that is the point

CapabilityOptimized MVPFull scope
App technologyCross-platformTwo native codebases
Infrastructure1 consolidated provider5 discrete partners + live failover
Markets at launchNigeria firstUK + Nigeria together
AdminLow-code + partner consolesBespoke admin platform
SupportOff-the-shelf widgetCustom AI assistant

Highlighted rows are where the full spec roughly doubles cost. None of this cuts the vision — every item is sequenced, not deleted.

05 · Requirements & RTM

Requirements traceability matrix

Every requirement carries a REQ-ID and maps to where it's satisfied. Filter by priority.

REQ-IDRequirementPriorityCovered by
06 · Delivery

Phases, gates & cutover

Phased delivery with a readiness gate between each — you can stop, review and re-scope at every gate.

Phase 0

Discovery

~4 weeks
  • Partner shortlist + real integration costs
  • Confirmed regulatory perimeter (counsel)
  • Prioritized backlog + firm estimate
Gate · scope signed
Phase 1

Nigeria MVP

~4–6 months
  • App on a licensed MMO/bank + BVN KYC
  • Consolidated provider under its umbrella
  • NGN ⇄ USDT/USD core loop live
Gate · pilot live
Phase 2

UK + hardening

~4–6 months
  • UK entity as EMD/PSD agent of an EMI
  • s21-compliant crypto promotions
  • Statements, limits, richer admin
Gate · UK live
Phase 3

Scale & transfer

ongoing
  • Second provider / live failover on volume
  • Selective in-housing of licences
  • Runbooks + knowledge transfer
Gate · you own it
07 · Timeline & risk

Vendor-slip stress test

This is the ~16-week Nigeria MVP integration window (Phase 1). Bars are placed in weeks: each regulated-partner integration and the product feature that depends on it. Drag a vendor's slip — every dependent feature cascades right and the mitigation appears. Plan against reality, not best case.

08 · Pricing & cost

Scope configurator

Toggle features — the budget recomputes live. Must-have is the Lean pilot; add Recommended for the Optimized MVP; add Optional for the full original scope. Must-haves are locked.

Estimated budget
$0
0 h · blended $52/h
09 · Phase comparison

What each phase buys you

The same figures as the live configurator in section 08, blended $52/h. Each tier is the one before it plus a block of features — the deltas below add up exactly to the totals.

+$60kLean → Optimized MVP
(adds the Recommended block)
+$158kMVP → Full scope
(adds the Optional block)
−$33kindicative saving from phasing vs big-bang*
How the budget builds up
Scope tierWhat it addsAdds @ $52/hCumulative build cost
Lean pilotMust-have core — Android-first, one consolidated provider~$140k
+ RecommendedSend & convert · statements, limits & audit · low-code admin · QA·BA·delivery+$60k~$200k · Optimized MVP
+ OptionalTwo native apps · 5-partner + failover · custom admin · AI assistant · extra currencies · UK package+$158k~$358k · Full scope
The +$60k and +$158k reconcile exactly with the build-up above (Lean $140k → MVP $200k → Full $358k) and with the live calculator in section 08. The −$33k is an indicative saving from sequencing the work rather than building all scope at once (less rework and coordination) — a planning estimate, not a line item in the calculator.
Side-by-side
AxisLean pilotOptimized MVPFull scope
MarketsNigeriaNigeria, UK Phase 2UK + Nigeria
App technologyAndroid-firstCross-platformTwo native
InfrastructureConsolidatedConsolidated + backup5 partners + failover
Feature coverageMust-haveMust + recommendedEverything
Indicative timeline~3–4 mo~4–6 mo (Phase 1)~9–12 mo
Indicative budget~$140k~$200k~$358k
10 · Support & operations

SLA, severity & knowledge transfer

Defined severities, response/restore targets, and a knowledge-transfer track so your team takes ownership.

Sev 1 · critical

15 min / 4 h

Response / restore. Payments, withdrawals or login down.

Sev 2 · major

1 h / 1 day

Degraded function, workaround exists.

Sev 3 · minor

1 day / next sprint

Cosmetic or low-impact issues.

11 · Q&A · feedback

Your questions, answered

Every written question and assumption you sent — how we handled it, whether it is in scope, and which phase it lands in.

Regulatory answers summarise our UK & Nigeria legal research from public regulator sources — a research summary, not legal advice. Confirm with qualified UK and Nigerian counsel before launch.
Indicative regulatory & licensing costs

What the licences themselves cost — and what that buys

Separate from the build budget in section 08. These are indicative government / regulator figures — capital plus application fees — for each route, so you can weigh the asset-light launch path against holding your own licences. Green rows are the recommended launch routes the build estimate assumes. Indicative only, not a quote and not legal advice.

RouteCoversIndicative capital lock-upGovernment / application feesWhat it enables
United Kingdom
EMD / PSD agent of a licensed EMI launchFiatNone of its ownPer-agent notification + revenue share to the principal (commercial)Branded multi-currency wallet with no own EMI licence — live in ~30–60 days
FCA cryptoasset MLR registrationCryptoNone prescribed (AML-only regime)~£11,150 application (Cat 6) + annual periodic feeBe the customer-facing crypto (buy / sell) provider to UK consumers
Own Authorised EMI later stageFiat€350,000 (~$380,000) + 2% of e-money float ongoing£5,580 application + ~£1,500 / yrHold customer fiat as principal — maximum control & margin
Nigeria
Partner with a licensed MMO / bank launchFiatNone of its ownCommercial terms with the partnerNaira wallet + BVN KYC via the partner; you build the app layer only
SEC VASP — Digital Asset Exchange / CustodianCrypto₦2bn (~$1.3–1.4m) by 30 Jun 2027₦300k app + ₦1m processing + ₦150m registration (2024 figures — confirm)Be the customer-facing crypto provider to Nigerian users
SEC ARIP onboarding (interim)CryptoPhased toward ₦2bn₦2,000,000 processing feeSupervised entry / Approval-in-Principle before full VASP registration
Own MMO licence later stageFiat₦2bn (~$1.3–1.4m) + ₦2bn refundable escrow₦100,000 app + ₦1,000,000 licenceHold Naira balances as principal

Assumptions. Figures are indicative government / regulator amounts drawn from public sources (e.g. FCA 2025/26 fees, CBN licence categories, SEC Circular 26-1 of Jan 2026) — not a quote and not legal advice. They exclude the real professional costs of getting authorised: specialist UK & Nigerian legal counsel, application preparation, compliance staffing, external audit and PI insurance — which routinely exceed the government fees themselves. USD conversions are approximate and move with Naira / GBP / EUR rates. Several figures are flagged for verification against the live rulebooks (FCA crypto fee, per-agent notification fee, SEC crypto registration fee, PSSP escrow). The build estimate in section 08 assumes the green launch routes, so none of this capital sits inside that budget — it is separate, regulatory expenditure to plan for alongside it.

12 · Team & compliance

Team, ramp & governance

Core team scaling at each gate, and the market-by-market regulatory reality baked in from day one. This is a research summary — confirm with qualified UK and Nigerian counsel before launch.

SA
Solution Architect
full engagement
FE
Mobile / cross-platform ×2
Phase 1-2
BE
Backend / integrations ×2
Phase 1-2
PM
Delivery Manager + QA
full engagement
Regulatory reality — the five decisions
Custody is the fork — holding fiat as principal triggers the UK EMI / Nigeria MMO licence. Partner-led defers that capital.
Crypto perimeter — a consumer buy/sell app is likely a registrable crypto business in each market even with Fireblocks/B2C2 behind it, unless a registered VASP is the contracting party.
No mutual recognition — UK, Nigeria, EU/EEA, UAE, US each need separate local licensing; post-Brexit no EU passport.
UK crypto promotions (s21) — only four legal routes; an EMI/PI licence alone does not permit it. Breach is a criminal offence.
Regimes are changing — UK FSMA crypto regime commences Oct 2027; Nigeria SEC crypto capital floor ₦2bn by Jun 2027. MLR is a stepping stone.
Two actions before crypto code — a counsel opinion on the perimeter in each market, and budget for separate local licensing in every market you enter.
13 · Relevant experience

Delivery proof

Challenge → what we built → tech → measurable result. Anonymized where under NDA.

Case · Neobank on partner rails

Consumer neobank built on licensed infrastructure

Challenge: a branded multi-currency wallet without holding the client's own banking licence.
Built: native apps, KYC onboarding, wallet and payment flows on an EMI/BaaS partner, provider adapter layer.
KotlinSwiftSumsubBaaS/EMI
Weeksto agent go-live
0own licences needed
Multicurrency wallets
Case · Custody & on-chain KYC

Crypto custody integration with tiered on-chain KYC

Challenge: let consumers hold and move crypto safely with compliant onboarding.
Built: MPC custody integration, up to 5-tier on-chain KYC, wallet screening, buy/sell flows.
Fireblocks-classMPCGoSolidity
5-tieron-chain KYC
Pooledcustody model
NDAregulated client

"They didn't just take our brief and quote it back. They showed us the leanest safe version, what each ambition adds, and let us choose with real numbers."

— Founder, consumer fintech (reference on request)
14 · About Innowise

Your engineering partner since 2007

European, full-cycle software engineering — end-to-end development, team augmentation, IT audits, support and consulting. We mobilise certified blockchain engineers from EU delivery centres and scale the team to each phase.

0in-house experts
0delivered projects
0years in software engineering
0in IAOP Global Outsourcing 100
Talent pool
Backend 280+
JavaPython.NETGo
Frontend 210+
ReactAngularVue
Blockchain 90+
SolidityFireblocksRustFabric
Mobile 200+
KotlinSwiftFlutterReact Native
Architects 120+
SolutionEnterpriseSecurity
Delivery 80+
PMBAQA lead